At Least 13 Killed in Gaza Strikes as Hamas Agrees to Disarmament Deal
The reported deaths came even as Hamas signalled agreement to a disarmament framework aimed at ending the broader conflict.
ByNaum Hussain· Senior Correspondent, World & Law
2 min read

At least 13 individuals have been confirmed dead in Gaza following a new wave of strikes, local health officials reported today. These tragic fatalities occurred even as Hamas, the governing authority in the Gaza Strip, signaled its agreement to a disarmament framework. This development is seen by regional mediators as a crucial step that could potentially pave the way towards de-escalation and a more durable resolution to the protracted conflict.
Disarmament Framework and Ceasefire Hopes
For several months, regional diplomatic efforts, spearheaded by Qatari and Egyptian officials, have been intensely focused on brokering a comprehensive arrangement. This proposed deal aims to see Hamas relinquish its remaining weapons stockpiles and capabilities. In return, the framework outlines a phased withdrawal of Israeli forces from the territory and guarantees for the extensive reconstruction of Gaza, which has been devastated by ongoing hostilities.
While the agreement in principle marks a significant diplomatic breakthrough, the specific modalities of disarmament and the timeline for its implementation remain subject to complex negotiations. Mediators have expressed cautious optimism, highlighting that securing Hamas's agreement to disarm is a foundational element for any lasting peace. However, the immediate continuation of strikes underscores the extreme volatility on the ground.
- At least 13 reported killed in the latest round of strikes.
- Hamas has agreed in principle to a disarmament framework, according to mediators.
- Qatar and Egypt have played central roles in shepherding the negotiations.
- Reconstruction funding remains a major unresolved issue.
International Reactions and Implementation Challenges
The announcement of Hamas's agreement to the disarmament framework has been met with guarded optimism from international officials. While widely welcomed as a potential breakthrough in the stalled peace process, there is a strong consensus that the path to full implementation will be fraught with challenges. The sheer scale of destruction across Gaza, coupled with deep-seated distrust between the warring parties, presents formidable obstacles to any lasting settlement.
Humanitarian organisations operating within Gaza have voiced grave concerns, emphasizing that the ongoing strikes highlight the extreme fragility of the situation. Civilian casualties continue to mount, creating a stark contrast with the reported diplomatic progress. These groups stress that the immediate priority must be the protection of non-combatants and ensuring unimpeded access for aid.
Humanitarian Crisis and Reconstruction Needs
The United Nations has issued an urgent call for an immediate and substantial scale-up of humanitarian access to Gaza, asserting that this must run in parallel with any political settlement. The international body has warned that the reconstruction needs in the besieged enclave are staggering, with estimates now running into the tens of billions of dollars. Without significant international commitment and a cessation of hostilities, the humanitarian catastrophe is set to deepen.
The simultaneous news of continued fatalities and a potential diplomatic breakthrough paints a complex picture for the future of Gaza. While Hamas's agreement to a disarmament framework offers a glimmer of hope for a de-escalation, the immediate priority remains the protection of civilians and the urgent delivery of humanitarian aid to a population enduring immense suffering.
Senior Correspondent, World & Law · Dhaka, Bangladesh
Naum Hussain reports on international affairs, courts and law enforcement for The Inscript. He has covered high-profile trials, migration corridors and regional diplomacy across South Asia.
Related Stories
Related Stories
First published 25 July 2026. Spotted an error? Read our corrections policy.